The Music Snob

Man Attacked by Giant Guitar

brian — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:34:34 +0000

I’m not sure what the deal is here, but I was walking down the street across from Penn Station the other day and saw this dude playing a gigantic guitar. He wasn’t actually being attacked by it, but me and many others were struck by its ridiculous size. The guy was playing real music on this thing. I think at the time he was doing an improvisation around the Star Spangled Banner or something…

It’s funny to think of the mad scientist mind that decided it would be a good idea to create a super-size guitar and make it entirely playable, although unwieldy, for a normal rocker dude. It sounded like, well, an electric guitar, though the lower strings had this huge deep open-string vibrating tone going on, kind of like how you can tell pretty much instantly when the low E on a guitar is in dropped D…

I hope this guy is making some nice spare change with his freak-show guitar. Props my man. It must be a total pain to carry to gigs. Or bring on the subway.

Music in the Dominican Republic Right now The Music Snob is in the Dominican Republic,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Pump Audio Music Licensing Controversy

brian — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:36:14 +0000

I’ve obviously been quite occupied with things unrelated to this blog for the past several months, but I’ve been impressed by the passionate responses here to Pump Audio’s decision to change the terms of their licensing split from 50/50 to 65/35 in their favor. The post I wrote (holy sh*t!) exactly a year ago today Pump Audio’s Re-Titling of Songs for Publishing and Pump Audio Reduces Artist Licensing Payments from back in May are still getting pretty frequent comments from musicians pissed off by Pump Audio’s unilateral action to reduce artist payments.

I’m also delighted(!) to see that we have the third-ranking site in Google’s organic results for Pump Audio. I LOVE that someone new to music licensing that is searching for info on Pump is going to see this headline on their first Google search “Pump Audio Reduces Artist Licensing Payments”. Those of you inclined to lean against the powers that be can continue to help the indie musician cause by linking to these articles.

I too received their announcement about the licensing agreement change, and so I’ve decided to just let my agreement lapse at the end of the year, which I think is what happens if you don’t sign and submit the new contract. I can’t claim to have done much business with them. In fact, I’m not sure they’ve licensed any of it…

This is clearly an issue affecting a lot of musicians out there, and we depend on every little income source we can find these days. Best of luck to those of you that are going the music licensing route! And good luck to all of you fighting the good fight…

Pump Audio Reducing Licensing Payments to Artists by 30% Yo yo yo. Any of you guys using Pump Audio...
Music Licensing and Re-Title Publishing, Pump Audio… Who is this man?! Why is he on this site?!...
Pump Audio’s Re-Titling of Songs for Publishing A reader sent me an email recently asking: When you/I...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Music Label 2.0

brian — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:11:32 +0000

Friend of themusicsnob Eric Hebert over at Evolver is busy launching a new service for musicians called Label 2.0. It’s a service they will be offering to educate indie musicians on how to promote music and create buzz in the post-record label universe.

Check it out!

Label 2.0

Your Online Music Marketing Strategy – Evolvor Media For some great tips on marketing your music online, we...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Realistic Expectations of an Indie Manager

brian — Tue, 26 May 2009 14:46:51 +0000

Today’s guest post is written by Jonathan Sigmon, aka “Sigs”, founder of Signature Entertainment:
————————————————————————-
Many artists and bands looking to take their music careers to the next level are looking for an artist manager. Putting together the right team around your band can be the difference between being a very talented local band or being able to actually tour and sustain a living. So what should you, the band, be looking for in an artist management company/representative and what are realistic expectations from them?

The answer to the first question is fairly easy. Simply look to see the results the manager has delivered in the past. Every artist manager is going to drone on and on about their connections to many industry executives (which can be legitimate or not), but the question you should be looking at for every person on your team (band mates included) is, “What can you deliver?” This sounds very business-like, which most artistic people want to run away from, but it is the reality of the situation if you are trying to make a sustainable career.

As for the realistic expectations of the manager, I think that both sides must spell this out during the contract and negotiations stage. For every manager it looks different and each one is going to have areas of strengths and weaknesses. However, there are some key questions about personal attributes and connections that you definitely want to explore, including:

What is the past experience and reputation of the manager?
Do they believe in your vision and are they willing to become your advocate?
Is there a connection to a recording studio that can produce the kind of sound your band is looking for?
Can the manager find you a booking agent?
Does the manager have business and contract negotiation experience?
Are there connections with a merch/graphic/web designer? Is there knowledge of your key music business websites and how to create a solid SEO for the band?
Does the manager know of a place for the band to practice?
Can the manager help you define and achieve your goals, as well as help decide where to invest your limited money?
Does the manager know how to find good writers for press, websites, contracts, etc. (i.e. publicist)?
Does the manager know how to get your songs published and ensure your royalties will be paid?
Does the manager have connections with a photographer and videographer?
Does the manager have relationships with any record labels in which you are interested? Do they at least have good phone conversation skills in order to discuss matters concerning your band?

Obviously, you may not need your artist manager to fulfill all of these duties, as you may already have some of these needs met (such as a practice space or a recording studio where you feel comfortable). As a band, it is important to prioritize the needs of the group and search for those attributes.

In today’s online world, you are looking for a person who has marketing expertise, an understanding of your target demographic, and is enthusiastic about you. As a band, remember that the manager is only getting paid a commission off of the money you are making. If you are a band that is at the level of only playing a couple of local shows, you can not have expectations that the manager will have connections or experience in all of these areas. However, most artist managers will look to get between 15-20% of your gross (with certain deductions). As a band, you have to ask if that type of investment is worthwhile for you. Hiring a manager may seem like you are giving up a lot of control and money, but not doing so is the mistake that many talented bands make across the world. When your music and fan base starts growing, so should your team. The person who assembles that team is your artist manager. This is by no means an exhaustive article for an artist manager, but for independent bands, this could give you a starting point in attributes to look for in your quest for an educated and connected artist manager.

——————————————————————-

About the Author:
Jonathan Sigmon (aka “Sigs”) is the founder of Signature Entertainment, an artist management company in Lancaster, PA and a blogger at TaintedCanvas on music business, faith, and marketing.

Crash on My Couch! Tour Lodging for the Indie Musician Finally, a company to serve those of us that wish...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

An Online Metronome for Practicing Musicians

brian — Wed, 13 May 2009 10:00:38 +0000

I got an email recently from MusicSupervisor in which they pointed out this sweet website:

Metronome Online.

No need to actually buy a metronome, just go to their site, click on the beats per minute you need, and magically you have your tempo. Awesome. As long as you are sitting near a computer! Rock on.

Sure beats the old version.

Staump.com – A Growing Online Community of Musicians We recently interviewed the founder of Staump.com, Tim Staump, to...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Pump Audio Reducing Licensing Payments to Artists by 30%

brian — Fri, 08 May 2009 10:00:47 +0000

Yo yo yo. Any of you guys using Pump Audio to license your music may want to pay attention to a change they’re rolling out in their artist agreement.

Beginning July 1st, 2009, Pump Audio will move to a 65/35 split with artists, instead of their existing 50/50 split. This means that licensed artists will see a drop in their take from each licensing fee by 30%. Awesome.

I was alerted to this Wednesday by an existing Pump Audio user. I followed up with their Artist Relations contact, and unfortunately the bad news is true.

Here’s what they said:

“…this move is being made to support the growth of our business on a global stage…”

“We believe and will work tirelessly to insure that Pump Audio continues to be the top music licensing company for real artists. As we grow and succeed, you will grow and succeed right along with us. Pump Audio has always been, and will always be one of the biggest supporters of independent artists, and our intention is to see all Pump contributors make more money with us in the coming years.”

Well. Naturally, my gut reaction is negative. Anything that means less money in the hands of music creators sounds like a bad deal to me, being a creator myself. The prevalence of web-based music licensing services, while making some media placements accessible to the average nobody musician, is contributing to the overall commoditization of music, meaning that its perceived value continues to drop. And now, not only do placements pay less because the availability of music is overwhelming, but Pump Audio will be paying you a smaller percentage of those fees.

Sounds like a winner for Pump.

Pump Audio also practices Re-Title Publishing, which means they re-register your songs under different names with their own publishing company, meaning the artist receives a smaller share of the backend royalties. Awesome.

So. Be forewarned. I’ve gotta get back to my night-shift at the local minimum wage national chain.

By the way. If anyone has any experience using Pump, please let us know. I heard from someone recently who had a placement in a national TV campaign, and only found out about it when a friend told him he’d seen his song on TV. Apparently this was last September, and no money has materialized thus far. I’m registered with them too but have nothing to show for it. My songs must suck!

Pump Audio Music Licensing Controversy I’ve obviously been quite occupied with things unrelated to this...
Music Licensing and Re-Title Publishing, Pump Audio… Who is this man?! Why is he on this site?!...
Pump Audio’s Re-Titling of Songs for Publishing A reader sent me an email recently asking: When you/I...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Make Music, not T-Shirts

brian — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:24:39 +0000

Today’s guest blog comes from Chris Wochagg at Wildscreen.tv, an online video portal for artists and musicians.

——————————————————

I’m tired of hearing the suggestion that musicians just have to cross finance through merchandising, ringtones, more gigs and expensive VIP tickets to their gigs. This may work for some bands – call it the Arctic Monkeys Bands – but it ignores a great field of composers and musicians committed to the studio and artists who aren’t willing to perform a rock’n’roll show every night and sell t-shirts, because their “fans“ may have outgrown the age of wearing band t-shirts.

Not every artist is able to entertain crowds nor is sorely tempted to be the focus of a photographer‘s lightning storm, but – and that’s the point – can be an appreciated musician/artist. So there is an enormous number of musicians out there who do not benefit from a “share everything and get more concert visitors” precept. It makes me believe that the idea of making money with additional goods should still be a great possibility to have a greater income and promote the artist, but not the only chance to survive.

This doesn’t mean that we should support DRM, set restrictions on the consumer or try to save the CD as a medium and the exploiting businesses of the majors. The era of the digitalization won’t stop, we’ve already passed the point of no return. Do we have to believe that nobody is going to pay for music anymore? Don’t think so. What we would need is transparency.

According to a lot of blog comments I’ve read the last months and conversations I’ve had with ordinary music consumers, it turns out, that yes, a lot of people would purchase music. From my point of view the problem is still the non-transparency relationship between the artist and the listeners: Music lovers feel patronized, controlled and criminalized by the industry and take the chance to give it a wipe by downloading illegally via torrents and so on. People rightly complain about the less distribution of profits to the artists, and I often hear that they would like to give their money to the artist not to the unknown industry surrounding the artist. To argue that the only chance to rebel against the abuses of a big music industry and to save the artist’s future is to download music illegally, is not that sustainable, I think. By doing so, we are killing the indies before the majors are reached. Too many independent labels were killed off over the past years. By downloading from other non-label illegal networks, people get paid, who care even far less than the most evil music manager. We pay them with our attention by clicking their advertisements.

I’m still missing an appropriate platform or an initiative, where music consumer’s demands are met. If people would like to give money to the(ir) artist, they need a clear definition of what the artist gets by buying the song/album. Imagine the “fair-trade coffee” culture: consumers willingly spend more money for “fair-priced” coffee to help producers in developing countries and promoting sustainability because they can trust the certificate that guarantees the fair trade. Wouldn’t this concept be possible for music industry? A certificate for music sold online and the same for a physical medium (be it vinyl, a CD or whatever physical medium will be established in the next few years).

A) Combine the online platform with information buyers used to get when they bought a physical medium and much more: Who wrote the song? Who produced it? When was it recorded? In which band did the guitarist play before? Keep me updated when they are on tour, give me the sound tracks for remixing it, and show me rehearsals, etc.

B) The physical medium could be produced from eco-friendly materials to provide sustainability. I’m pretty sure people would start taking care and bring the discussion to a moral level if there is an explicit way to support what they cherish.

I am aware that this approach requires a great moral acting in an easy-to-steal world, but our make-it-sustainable generation gives me hope.

-Chris Wochagg

No related posts.

Tips for Evaluating Music Licensing Opportunities

brian — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:00:58 +0000

We’ve looked at a ton of different music licensing services here at themusicsnob, and today’s tips on music licensing are a guest blog by Kevin Breuner, musician, blogger, and CD Baby employee.

Licensing Companies – What to look for and what to avoid

This past week, I had a number of artists ask me about potential music licensing deals that they had on the table. The common concern was whether or not the deal they were being offered was legit. This is something that could be discussed in great detail on a case by case basis, but I thought I would give a few brief bullet points on some things to considerbefore getting involved with a licensing company.

Are they a licensing company or a music library? - The lines can be a bit blurry here, but a general distinction between the two is that a licensing company will pitch individual tracks, where a music library might supply clients with a searchable hard drive of music with thousands of tracks. In general, a licensing company will get higher fees.

What rights are they asking for? - At a minimum, you have to grant a licensing company the right to represent your music, but there can be varying levels of artist involvement for each placement they negotiate. Some contracts are pre-cleared(Meaning they don’t have to get the artist to sign off on each individual placement), and others give the artist the right of refusal before the deal goes through. Most indie artist will encounter pre-cleared contracts. Another thing to look for is if it’s exclusive or non-exclusive.

What type of placements do they typically get? - All licensing companies are not created equally. Most of them have areas of strength and weakness, so one company may be really strong on network TV, but not as great at getting songs placed in film trailers. Another company may specialize in getting music into video games. One thing to watch out for are companies that do a lot of bulk licensing deals that return little money to the artists they represent

What percentage do they take? - Fees can range between 20%-50% of the gross licensing fee, but it’s important to keep that in perspective. A small company that gets a high number of placements for you might be worth the 50% fee.

*Things to Avoid*

Don’t work with a company that asks for an upfront fee - They should make their money off of getting songs placed, not by getting you to sign up more songs

Don’t grant them mechanical rights - Some licensing companies will slip some language into the contract that allows them to release your music in album form and make money off of it. A standard sync license contract is pretty straight forward, but granting mechanical rights ventures into record company territory which is far more complex. This should be avoided at all cost.

Don’t permanently sign over any rights to the song - That would be more of a publishing deal, which can be beneficial, but it’s important to make a distinction between a publishing deal and a sync licensing representation deal.

————————————————

Thanks Kevin for your guest blog! If you enjoyed reading his thoughts, check out his blog, and the DIY Musician Podcast he runs at CD Baby.

Using Online Services to License Your Music As CD sales continue to dry up, music licensing has...
Pump Audio Music Licensing Controversy I’ve obviously been quite occupied with things unrelated to this...
Music Licensing and Brand Marketing: Rumblefish Rumblefish is a web-based company that connects artists and labels...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Guest Bloggers & Music Industry Journalists Wanted

brian — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:41:00 +0000

TheMusicSnob has been sidetracked the past several months, as evident by our lack of posts. Our site has a large readership of music industry professionals and independent musicians, and many posts have spawned great discussions on marketing tools and music licensing opportunities. We’d like to see this continue…

If you are interested in writing a guest post, interview or article on the music industry, music marketing or something else related, please get in touch with us. We are as interested as ever in learning the latest strategies for successful independent musicians.

Email brian@themusicsnob.com

Today’s Most Innovative Music Industry Directory The top 5 reasons why The Music Snob’s Industry Directory...
Free Publicity – Get Interviewed Here! Since I’m no expert, I started this site to document...
What is TheMusicSnob.com?!?! Think of the www.themusicsnob.com as a wikipedia-style encyclopedia of resources...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Paid Music Downloads Increased in 2008

brian — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:57:35 +0000

There’s an encouraging article at WebProNews entitled Online Music Purchases Increase. It appears that digital music consumers were willing to pay for music in 2008. So while we can all lament the demise of giant record labels and massive blockbuster releases, the independent artist may be better off. Here are some interesting points from the article:

The number of people buying music online increased by 8 million people, for a total of 36 million, in 2008
13 million fewer buyers of music in the US last year
Online social networks are playing an increasingly important role in shaping music listening. (duh)

Check it out if you feel like it…

Using Online Services to License Your Music As CD sales continue to dry up, music licensing has...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.