<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips for Evaluating Music Licensing Opportunities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/</link>
	<description>The brains of the music industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:43:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-11714</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-11714</guid>
		<description>What does &quot;gross fee&quot; include? Is the master and publishing aka &quot;all-in&quot; licensing fee, or is it just the master side?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;gross fee&#8221; include? Is the master and publishing aka &#8220;all-in&#8221; licensing fee, or is it just the master side?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavalous</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-8193</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavalous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-8193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been totally unaware of all this stuff. Big ups dude, you&#039;ve upgraded my brains to a better level. Thanx again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been totally unaware of all this stuff. Big ups dude, you&#8217;ve upgraded my brains to a better level. Thanx again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Licensing Research Part 2 &#124; friedroots.com</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-7470</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Licensing Research Part 2 &#124; friedroots.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-7470</guid>
		<description>[...] just seeking music supervisors, we also wanted to sign our music up to different licensing sites. The Music Snob has a great post called &#8220;Tips For Evaluating Music Licensing Opportunities&#8220;. Some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just seeking music supervisors, we also wanted to sign our music up to different licensing sites. The Music Snob has a great post called &#8220;Tips For Evaluating Music Licensing Opportunities&#8220;. Some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Breuner</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Breuner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>If someone asked you not to join a PRO, that would be a huge warning sign and a definite reason not to work with them.  That&#039;s just lost money for you.

Kevin Breuner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone asked you not to join a PRO, that would be a huge warning sign and a definite reason not to work with them.  That&#8217;s just lost money for you.</p>
<p>Kevin Breuner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Oakroot</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Oakroot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t have the URL in front of me when I was typing the previous comment, but it&#039;s http://pro.jamendo.com

I thought their contract looked OK until I got to the part about no PRO membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have the URL in front of me when I was typing the previous comment, but it&#8217;s <a href="http://pro.jamendo.com" rel="nofollow">http://pro.jamendo.com</a></p>
<p>I thought their contract looked OK until I got to the part about no PRO membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-3165</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I would avoid that one. You may want to let us know what the name of it is, so other community members can check it out and see if it&#039;s credible or not. Judging from what you&#039;ve written, though, it sounds sketchy. It&#039;s a good thing that you are proceeding with caution. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I would avoid that one. You may want to let us know what the name of it is, so other community members can check it out and see if it&#8217;s credible or not. Judging from what you&#8217;ve written, though, it sounds sketchy. It&#8217;s a good thing that you are proceeding with caution. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Oakroot</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2009/04/27/tips-music-licensing-and-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Oakroot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=770#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>With a new album coming out shortly, I&#039;ve been looking into licensing ops... and found another one to avoid:

This licensing company insists that its artists not be members of a PRO (ASCAP, BMI, etc.), because &quot;PRO agreements are exclusive&quot;. (PROs are exclusive in the sense that you can&#039;t join two PROs, but not in the sense of prohibiting you from licensing your music without involving the PRO.)

Sounds to me like they want to limit their artists to folks who don&#039;t know what they&#039;re doing... smells like a songshark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a new album coming out shortly, I&#8217;ve been looking into licensing ops&#8230; and found another one to avoid:</p>
<p>This licensing company insists that its artists not be members of a PRO (ASCAP, BMI, etc.), because &#8220;PRO agreements are exclusive&#8221;. (PROs are exclusive in the sense that you can&#8217;t join two PROs, but not in the sense of prohibiting you from licensing your music without involving the PRO.)</p>
<p>Sounds to me like they want to limit their artists to folks who don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re doing&#8230; smells like a songshark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
