<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Music Licensing and Brand Marketing: Rumblefish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/</link>
	<description>The brains of the music industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:43:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tvyork</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/comment-page-1/#comment-11517</link>
		<dc:creator>tvyork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=377#comment-11517</guid>
		<description>I am new to this,glad I saw your address.Just recorded my first cd.I am glad there are watchers like you out there.I do not know what I am going to do with my cd,but this sounds good to try.Nothing to lose.Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new to this,glad I saw your address.Just recorded my first cd.I am glad there are watchers like you out there.I do not know what I am going to do with my cd,but this sounds good to try.Nothing to lose.Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wtf</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/comment-page-1/#comment-8068</link>
		<dc:creator>wtf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=377#comment-8068</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe it. My music was rejected by Rumblefish. Listen, I&#039;m no slouch as a musician, I have over 20 year professional experience and have had my stuff licensed for film, TV and more.
So what the hell gives?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe it. My music was rejected by Rumblefish. Listen, I&#8217;m no slouch as a musician, I have over 20 year professional experience and have had my stuff licensed for film, TV and more.<br />
So what the hell gives?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Licensing and Brand Marketing: Licensing Music with Rumblefish: Part II &#124; The Music Snob</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Licensing and Brand Marketing: Licensing Music with Rumblefish: Part II &#124; The Music Snob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=377#comment-463</guid>
		<description>[...] of our look at Rumblefish, the music licensing and sonic branding company.  Yesterday we reviewed the essential details of their licensing procedures, contracts, and some great things about their model. Today we look at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of our look at Rumblefish, the music licensing and sonic branding company.  Yesterday we reviewed the essential details of their licensing procedures, contracts, and some great things about their model. Today we look at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobomo</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=377#comment-343</guid>
		<description>One other downside to these automated licensing sites is that if you compose loop-based electronic tracks, the licensee can&#039;t get professional custom arranging. My &quot;final&quot; tracks are usually just rough arrangements, because the application really dictates the structure and length. I shudder at the thought of some inexperienced person hacking up my tracks in Wavelab to fit the project, when it would be so simple to do in the DAW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other downside to these automated licensing sites is that if you compose loop-based electronic tracks, the licensee can&#8217;t get professional custom arranging. My &#8220;final&#8221; tracks are usually just rough arrangements, because the application really dictates the structure and length. I shudder at the thought of some inexperienced person hacking up my tracks in Wavelab to fit the project, when it would be so simple to do in the DAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Clous</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Clous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=377#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Again,wonderful stuff!  Thanks so much!

Scott Clous
www.clousfamily.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again,wonderful stuff!  Thanks so much!</p>
<p>Scott Clous<br />
<a href="http://www.clousfamily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.clousfamily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Music Snob Features Rumblefish this Month &#62; RumbleBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.themusicsnob.com/2008/09/03/music-licensing-brand-marketing-rumblefish/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Music Snob Features Rumblefish this Month &#62; RumbleBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themusicsnob.com/?p=377#comment-209</guid>
		<description>[...] Snob.com features Rumblefish in an in-depth two-part article this month.  The article is very well written and touches on the two unique faces of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Snob.com features Rumblefish in an in-depth two-part article this month.  The article is very well written and touches on the two unique faces of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
